Us Farmers Are Bailed Out, Indian Farmers Are Left To Die

Amidst the raging ground on the farm suicide toll inward Republic of Republic of India comes this interesting study about the huge agricultural subsidies beingness doled out to the U.S.A. farmers. In India, nearly 200,000 farmers possess got taken the fatal road to escape the humiliation that comes along alongside growing indebtedness (in the absence of straight income support) betwixt 1997 together with 2008.

The U.S.A. has paid a quarter of a trillion every bit farm subsidies inward almost the same period, betwixt 1995 together with 2009. Farmers non exclusively instruct “direct support”, they likewise receive the create goodness of “counter-cyclic payments”, “market loss payments” together with directly subsidies nether the crop insurance programme together with the bio-fuel programme. No wonder, spell Indian farmers accept to gallows, U.S.A. farmers (I am talking of the big farmers/Corporate firms) quietly proceed on a cruise vacation every year.  

The study “Government’s Continued Bailout for Corporate Agriculture”  published past times Environmental Working Group (EWG) endorses what is beingness said inward this column fourth dimension together with again. Let us expect at some of the salient findings:

1. U.S.A. paid a quarter of a trillion inward farm subsidies betwixt 1995 together with 2009.

2. Direct payments possess got averaged around $ five billion every twelvemonth since 2005.

3. Subsidies nether the crop insurance programme possess got tripled — from $ 2.7 billion inward 2005 to $ 7.3 billion inward 2009.

4. Since 1995, crop insurance subsidies possess got crossed $ 35 billion.

5. Between 1995 together with 2009, the richest 10 per cent of the farm families pocketed 74 per cent of the entire subsidy. 

6. On an average, the wealthiest 10 per cent received a full payment of $ 445,127 inward the past times xv years.

7. Small farmers received an average of $ 8,862 per recepient inward the same period. 

Now this should last some assort of an eyeopener. After all, when nosotros enjoin Indian farmers to increase productivity (and I run into this beingness the park refrain amid agricultural scientists, agribusiness companies together with parliamentarians) I neglect to sympathize how enhancing crop yields would increase farm income. I possess got oftentimes asked this enquiry to senior scientists together with economists, who unfortunately possess got no sentiment of the political economic scheme that determines farm wealth inward the OECD countries.

They tend to believe that farmers inward US/Europe are rich because they possess got high productivity. To my understanding, this is the main ground why Indian farmers proceed to suffer. They possess got been misled to believe that the higher their crop productivity, the to a greater extent than volition last their income. In the US, farmers are surviving because of direct income back upward (in diverse forms) together with non because of the ‘farm-to-fork’ variety of marketplace operations.

The U.S.A. knows the toll of feeding the loss-making farms is much to a greater extent than than what is ordinarily spent on importing food. But it all the same is willing to accept that adventure knowing that nutrient self-sufficiency is cardinal to national sovereignty. In fact, it goes a pace ahead. It is making an all out endeavor (along alongside the EU) to last the nutrient bowl of the globe. The to a greater extent than the globe depends upon US/EU for food, the to a greater extent than volition last the political potency of these ii blocks over the entire world.

Read the commentary past times EWG president Ken Cook at